Interactivity, Participatory, and Sometimes Democratic
The common thread through the readings for this week ("Happenings," "Augmenting Human Intellect," "Sketchpad," "The Construction of Change," and "A File Structure for the Complex") concerns interactivity, or the level at which a creator/operator/user runs the machine. The readings point towards what we now call interactivity, which often leads to discussion of "participatory" enviroments allowed by new media--which at their best might allow democratic expressions, and at their worst might threaten privacy and safety.
But the writers for this week's readings weren't quite there yet, as precient as the essays are. The authors reveal the complexity of what we take for granted, and I realize how little I know when I'm confused by reading the most basic engineering theories.
I was especially interested by Ascott, who in "The Construction of Change" questions the relationship between knowlege and perception and how that plays out in art and science, and in how we organize information. Ascott even appears to predict how restructuring art (through technology) will lead to interdisciplinary ventures.
END OF POST
END OF POST
1 Comments:
You're image really puts the idea of interactivity in a new light. I think we mostly think that interactivity is a new thing and forget about the fact that running a computer used to be a much more physical thing. When I first started in the computer world one of the companies I consulted for still used Fortran and I was amazed as I watched the operators feed the machine punch cards.
I think one of the things that is particularly interesting with modern notions of interactivity is the social component--e.g., Web 2.0 stuff. It's not just interacting with the machine any more, it's interacting with others via the machine like through Facebook or Worlds of Warcraft.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home